WSPI - 10.94
TGA - 5.33
AIS - 1.14
AAU - 2.86
Things I was looking for:
- Had to be highly rated on CAPS
- Chart had to show "potential" for growth
- Looking for stocks that had attempted to break the previous day's high.
Invested: $5,000
Gained: $1,599.86
Lost: $0
Balance: 1599.86
Invested: $4,000
Gained: $158.86
Lost: $239.01
Balance: -$80.15
I use the word good, because this depends on the sector that the stock is in. There is no generic number, but generally the lower the PE the better.
Calculation can be done one of two ways, (however this is normally available on any financial site)Be aware there are a number of different types of P/E numbers:
- P/E = share price divided by earnings per share
- P/E = market capitalization divided by net income
If a company sells a division for substantially more than its book worth, this will affect the P/E.
- Current P/E - uses the past 12 months
- Forward P/E - uses predicted earnings per share
Many people prefer to use free cash flow rather then P/E for valuation.
Note: P/B (Price to Book) should only be used for those companies with negative earnings. I don't like companies with negative earnings so I didn't learn much about it.
Note: P/S (Price to Sale) should only be used for those companies which are unprofitable. I don't like these companies so I didn't learn much about it.
From The Motley Fool - P/E definition
From Yahoo Finance - P/E By Sector
A PEG of less then one generally is a good sign that a company is undervalued.
Calculation: P/E divided by rate earnings will grow (a guess)
A PEG of 1 = A fairly valued company
A PEG below 1 = An undervalued company
A PEG above 1 = An overvalued company
PEG is not helpful when the earnings estimate is 0 or negative
From The Motley Fool - Usefulness of PEG
PSPT - googlePrice: $1.87
Recommended on caps site, This is a wild guess in the dark as I have not learned anything yet.
Fundamentals:
Questions to be Asked
- Free Cash Flow: 10.2 Mill
- Market cap: 181 Mill
- Debt: 38.71 Mill
- Enterprise value: 209.51
- True Value: $2.18 / share
- P/E: 16.1
- Sector P/G Rating: 14.5
- 5 year earning estimate: Unknown, not given
- PEG: Unknown due to earnings estimates
- Operating Income/Loss: +22 Mill
- Y - Company has Positive Cash Flow
- Y - Stock is priced under $10.00
- Y - Stock is under valued - Est. value is $2.18
- Y - Is Small Cap Stock under 1 Bill market cap
- Y - PE is below sector average
- Y - Last quarter was profitable
- Y - YTD was profitable
- Y - Last Year was profitable
- NA - Has positive quarterly estimates (Can not find)
- NA - PEG is less then 1.0 (Can not find)
- NA - chart patterns (None found)
ISV- googlePrice: $9.40
Recommended on caps site, This is a wild guess in the dark as I have not learned anything yet.
After evaluating this stock, I decied that it wasn't that great a pick. Mostly due to the fact that the true value of the stock is not that high. Not an undervalued stock.
Fundamentals:
Questions to be Asked
- Free Cash Flow: 15
- Market cap: 227.09
- Debt: 0
- Enterprise value: 114
- True Value: 114/23.56 = 4.75
- P/E: 13.36
- 5 year earning estimate: 22
- PEG: .60
- Sector P/G Rating: 22.65
- Y - Company has Positive Cash Flow
- Y - Stock is priced under $10.00
- N - Stock is under valued - Est. value is $5.0
- Y - Is Small Cap Stock under 1 Bill market cap
- Y - PE is below sector average
- Y - Last quarter was profitable
- Y - YTD was profitable
- Y - Last Year was profitable
- Y - Has positive quarterly estimates
- N - PEG is less then 1.0 (Only if profitable and has earning estimates)
- ???? - chart patterns
Price: $9.40
Recommended on caps site, This is a wild guess in the dark as I have not learned anything yet.
Fundamentals:
- Free Cash Flow: -16.5 - .32 = -17MM
- Market cap: 129MM
- Debt: 9 MM
- Enterprise value: 128 + 17 + 8 = 153MM
- True Value: 153/93.82 = 1.82
Stopped Researching at this point as I did not like what I was seeing so far...True Value seems to indicate a lot for a stock
Signals that the price will make a downward move after having moved up in past periods.
Inverse Head and Shoulder signals the opposite
Signals that the price will continue in an upward direction after the handle after having moved down in past periods.
Pattern should be a nicely rounded formation, similar to a semi-circle.
The valley should be between one-third and two-thirds the size of the previous upward movement
Sometimes called "Twin Peaks"
Double Top (M) - Signals a downward direction change after moving up in past periods
Double Bottom (W) - Signals an updated direction change after moving down in past periods
Signals a consolidation to a given price. Once consolidated it may move in original direction, but it can go in the opposite direction.
Triangle shape, the top of the triangle will be straight. Each "side" of the triangle should be "tested"/"touched" multiple times.
Signals the price is to take an upward direction.
The optimum point to get in on this is right before it moves above the top of the triangle.
Descending Triangle signals the exact opposite.
Looks a lot like the symmetrical triangles, however they tend to last over longer periods of time.
Good Question: What's the difference between a wedge and a triangle
A gap doesn't signify much as far as price trending, other then drastic changes in price.
Trend has to test the same limit 3 times
Trend has to fall to the same support 2 times
Each test of limit will be marked with declining volume
Signals a downward direction
Trend has to test the same limit 3 times
Trend has to fall to the same support 3 times
Signals an upward direction
Be careful as this looks just like Triple Top but signals an upward trend.
Investpedia
A stock which is currently selling below it's true value. This stock is predicated to at least rebound to it's current level. (Investpedia - definition)Small Cap Stock
Companies with market values between $100 million and $2.5 billion to qualify as a small cap. (See previous post)
References:
The Motley Fool - Foolish 4 Investing Strategy
The Motley Fool - Farewell to Foolish 4
Price: $??.??
Notes and observations about the stock
Fundamentals:
Questions to be Asked
- Free Cash Flow: Cash Flow from Operations - Capital Expenditures
- Market cap: Current Share Price * Total Shares Outstanding
- Debt: Total Liabilities + Short Term Liabilities
- Enterprise value: Market Cap - Cash + Debt
- True Value: Market Cap / Total Shares
- P/E: Researched
- 5 year earning estimate: Researched and Best Guess
- PEG: P/E divided Earning Est
- Sector P/G Rating: Researched
- Operating Income/Loss: Total Income
- Y/N - Company has Positive Cash Flow
- Y/N - Stock is priced under $10.00
- Y/N - Stock is under valued - Est. value is $?.??
- Y/N - Is Small Cap Stock under 1 Bill market cap
- Y/N - PE is below sector average
- Y/N - Last quarter was profitable
- Y/N - YTD was profitable
- Y/N - Last Year was profitable
- Y/N - Has positive quarterly estimates
- Y/N - PEG is less then 1.0 (Only if profitable and has earning estimates)
- ???? - chart patterns
Screen-Based Investing.
Many quantitative analysts use "screens" to select their investments, meaning that they use a number of quantitative criteria and examine only the companies that meet these criteria. As the use of computers has become widespread, this approach has increased in popularity because it is easy to do. Screens can look at any number of factors about a company's business or its stock over many time periods.
While some investors use screens to generate ideas and then apply fundamental analysis to assess those specific ideas, others view screens as "mechanical models" and buy and sell purely based on what comes up on the screen. These investors claim that using the screen removes emotions from the investing process. (Those who do not use screens would counter that using a screen mechanically also removes most of the intelligence from the process.) One of the proponents of using screens as a starting point is Eric Ryback, and one of the most famous advocates of screens as a mechanical system is James O'Shaughnessy.
Things to check out:
The more the better, nuff said.
Information to do the calculation can be found on "statement of cash flows"
The calculation: Cash flow from operations - capital expenditures
From Motley Fool - Free Cash flow defined
Small caps give investors the edge, because institutions tend to ignore them and analysts don't cover them. By the time anyone realizes they're there, they've already grown much larger, and appreciated in price.Rule: Company must have had a "surprise" of 20% or more in last quarter
Companies with market values between $100 million and $2.5 billion to qualify as a small cap.
"The greatest gains from stock investing are to be found not among the Googles of the world, the well-known, much-loved and overanalyzed large caps. They're found in the tiny corners and crevices of the market, where analysts have yet to tread."
The Motley Fool
Seek companies that had an earnings surprise of 20% or more last quarter, but also have the prospect of growing earnings at least 20% annually for the next five years, according to analysts.Rule: Seeing Lots of Volume? Beware of institutional traders
The Motley Fool
Many investors say volume is where the large institutional traders leave their footprint on the market.
From Yahoo Investing
In other words, I want my small caps to sell at bargain-basement prices. An EV/FCF ratio of 10 or less gets my attention real quick. Anything pricier than that, I need to take a good hard look at the company's growth rate and EV/FCF/G ratio.Rule: PEG should be less than one.
Calculation looks like the following;
Free Cash Flow = Cash flow from operations - capital expenditures
Market cap = current share price * total shares outstanding
Debt = long-term debt + short-term debt
Enterprise value = market capitalization - cash and equivalents + debt
From The Motley FoolAfter some consideration, I decided to remove this rule. I believe that the guess part leads to areas where I can make errors in judgment. I do reserve the right to come back and examine this. (Plus I'm not sure I understand all of this one)
A ratio used to determine a stock's value while taking into account earnings growth. The calculation is as follows:
Calculated as a stock's P/E ratio divided by its projected year-over-year earnings growth rate. In other words, the ratio measures how cheap the stock is while taking into account its earnings growth. If the company's PEG ratio is less than one, it is considered to be undervalued.
From Investpedia - Definition
Value stocks are trading for less than their apparent worth and have potential to get back to and surpass there apparent worth.
Growth stocks are trading higher than their apparent worth but have potential to outgrow there current worth.
From Investpedia
Stocks I noted watch on Friday 08/03/2007:
CHNG - googlePrice: $6.65
Recommended on caps site, This is a wild guess in the dark as I have not learned anything yet.
This is an OTC stock which may cause problems when trying to trade.
Price: $6.26TGB- google
Recommended on caps site, This is a wild guess in the dark as I have not learned anything yet.
I noticed that it only had 12 thumbs up which is very low. Could be a pump and dump
Price: $5.10
Recommended on caps site, This is a wild guess in the dark as I have not learned anything yet.
Copyright 2009 Stock Investing. Powered by Blogger
Blogger Templates created by Deluxe Templates
Wordpress by Nattywp